Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MAINE: Legislature considering outlawing smoking in bars
SJOnline ^ | 4-30-03 | Bonnie Washuk

Posted on 05/01/2003 4:47:09 AM PDT by SheLion

Some lawmakers, including Gov. John Baldacci, are posed to outlaw smoking in bars. If they do, Maine could be the fifth state to ban smoking in bars.

Earlier this month the Legislative Health and Human Services Committee voted 12-1 to ban smoking in bars effective Jan. 1. The only exception would be off-track betting parlors.

The same committee also voted 10-3 to ban smoking at bingo and Beano games.

The committee’s recommendations will be considered by the full House and Senate when the bills reach the floors for votes. That is expected in the next few weeks.

“If the bill reaches his desk, he more than likely will sign it,” Lee Umphrey, Baldacci’s director of communications said Monday. Having smoking banned in bars “clearly reflects his interest in a healthy Maine,” Umphrey said.

Sponsor Sen. Karl Turner, R-Cumberland, said he wants to protect bartenders, waiters and waitresses and others from secondhand smoke. Given the fact that secondhand smoke has been classified by the Environmental Protection Agency as a Class A carcinogen, and is a known cause of lung cancer, asthma and other diseases, Turner asked how can the state allow a workplace to exist where workers are exposed? “The evidence is overwhelming,” he said.

There are excellent paying jobs in bars and taverns, but people should not be subjected to something that could hurt them to earn a living, Turner said. Nor should any employer or manager feel comfortable exposing workers “to something that causes disease.”

Others on the committee, including Rep. Margaret Craven, D-Lewiston, and Rep. Will Walcott, D-Lewiston, agreed.

“I’m concerned about workers, people in there who don’t smoke,” Walcott said. Many bars are small, and the second-hand smoke is concentrated. “Secondhand smoke is a killer.” Banning smoking in bars “is the right thing to do,” Walcott said. Less secondhand smoke would help lower health care costs in Maine, he said.

While some say banning smoking would hurt bars by keeping smoking patrons away, Craven said the Ramada Inn in Lewiston is smoke free. “They lost a few patrons in the beginning, but new patrons have come in,” she said.

That was confirmed Monday by Gary Adams, owner of the Ramada Inn. His lounge has been smoke-free for two years, and his entire complex became smoke-free recently with no guestrooms designated for smokers. “We did it on customer request,” Adams said. Complaints about secondhand smoke have become more prevalent, he said. Banning smoking in the bar did mean that some regulars stopped coming, but others who stayed away because of the smoke have become new patrons, Adams said. “And it will be easier when it is universal, versus selective” lounges that have gone smoke free, he said.

Other establishments, such as J’s Oyster in Portland, have told lawmakers they’re opposed to the bill and worry that the bill could put them and other bars out of business.

Craven, Walcott and Turner predicted the bill will pass and be signed by the governor. Dr. Dora Mills, director of the Bureau of Health, testified for the bill, an indication the governor favors the bill.

But Rep. Edward Dugay, D-Cherryfield, the lone committee vote against, said Monday he “doesn’t buy” the argument that the bill is all about protecting bar workers.

Bartenders and wait staff don’t have to work in bars and lounges, they can work someplace else, Dugay said. He’s spoken to several bars in his district where the owners have spent thousands on equipment to have smoke removed. It would be unfair to them to change the rules, Dugay said. Instead of a statewide smoking ban in bars, he’d favor more regional or municipal bans.

Dugay predicted the bill will not pass. “I know the vote is 12-1 in committee, but I think I can turn this around when it gets to the floor,” he said.

bwashuk@sunjournal.com


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; US: Maine
KEYWORDS: antismokers; bans; butts; cigarettes; individualliberty; michaeldobbs; niconazis; prohibitionists; pufflist; smokingbans; taxes; tobacco; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-248 next last
Gov Baldacci - Little Hitler


1 posted on 05/01/2003 4:47:09 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *puff_list; Just another Joe; Great Dane; Max McGarrity; Tumbleweed_Connection; Madame Dufarge; ...
I am TOTALLY FED UP with the dictatorship coming from the Governor AND the lawmakers in MAINE!

Who are THEY to go into a private business and tell them how to run it!

2 posted on 05/01/2003 4:48:38 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
“I’m concerned about workers, people in there who don’t smoke,” Walcott said. Many bars are small, and the second-hand smoke is concentrated. “Secondhand smoke is a killer.” Banning smoking in bars “is the right thing to do,” Walcott said. Less secondhand smoke would help lower health care costs in Maine, he said.

PROVE IT JERK! Show me ONE death certificate that states just ONE person died from second hand smoke...........then maybe I might .........just MIGHT believe it.

3 posted on 05/01/2003 4:49:49 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
"Craven said the Ramada Inn in Lewiston is smoke free"

Gosh, 25 years ago I used to hang out there, smoking and drinking, in the "Kit Kat Lounge."

4 posted on 05/01/2003 4:52:04 AM PDT by billorites (freepo ergo sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: *all
The place I love to go and have a wonderful meal, spend my money and TIP well is the Par and Grill in Caribou.

In 1999, the asinine Board of Health along with the lawmakers, passed that ASININE bill to make all restaurants smoke free. The Par and Grill, which was called Pat's Pizza back then, were forced to go smoke free. For a whole year, we never stepped foot back into that place, although it broke my heart. It's my favorite place in all of Aroostook County.

Within a year, the owner was going broke. She was going to close the doors, when she decided to buy a very expensive liquor license. And that is what allowed her to once again, open up her smoking section. We couldn't WAIT to get back there!!!!!!!!

Now, here we go again. I am sick and tired of "little nazi's" sitting in our state house and lording over us. I think it's time to CLEAN HOUSE!

Gov. Baldacci caters to the Somali's in Lewiston, Maine, but he sure wants to stick it to his own Mainers just because they smoke. Where is the justice!

I KNEW his true colors would emerge sooner or later!

But oh boy! Does he ever want that Tobacco Settlement Money! To WHICH the Maine smokers are paying for!

5 posted on 05/01/2003 4:56:22 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: billorites
"Craven said the Ramada Inn in Lewiston is smoke free"

Lewiston is over run with Somali's.

A bar is a bar is a bar, but in Maine, a LOT of our bars serve food! I don't go to the Par and Grill to DRINK! I go there for a good meal, cups of coffee, to relax and smoke. They get my money and I tip good.

This place almost closed back in 2000 because of the smoking ban. The manager told me that if this passes, he may as well close down now, because that's what it will come to anyway.

Maine.......poorest state in the Union. And it's no wonder with all the DemocRATS AND RINO'S in the STATE House.........

6 posted on 05/01/2003 4:59:44 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
The Health/Safety Nazis, at work again.

Listen...*all* we have to do is get a couple of Senators or other high-level officials tossed on this issue to scare everybody fecal-less on this issue and turn back the tide. That's it. Even ONE guy bounced out of office. Smokers still make up at least 25% of the population...that's more than enough. We just need a politician with the cajones to run on it, push it, win on it...then, you got others scared because THEY NOW KNOW THEY CAN LOSE ON THIS SINGLE ISSUE, and, second, it becomes part of the agenda, and setting the agenda is the most important part of all...

I'm not going to bother with the rants on the BS of second-hand smoke, or the absurdity of not being able to open all-smoking bar if you have all your employees sign off...I will say that my father was one of Heckler's chief speechwriters when she worked at HHS, and, ah, the fun of the funding shill game, there was a guy down the hall who was doing a study on the benefits of smoking, which include: Increased short term memory, dual-action (picks you up when needed, puts you down when needed), aids in digestion...you think he got his study funded? ;-)
7 posted on 05/01/2003 5:02:33 AM PDT by Kip Lange (The Khaki Pants of Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
In Alabama we require smoking in bars. It keeps the riff raff out.
8 posted on 05/01/2003 5:02:36 AM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (At Least I'm Relevent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
The Boston smoking ban is about to go into effect. The one in New York is causing a severe backlash. See the above note. SOMEONE has got to step up and make this an issue. Where are my lobbyists when I need them? Sure, smoking is a stupid thing to do to your body, but I RESERVE MY RIGHT TO BE STUPID, thank you very much.

They will pry the pack of Marlboros from my cold, dead, fingers.

Is it not ironic that Timothy Leary's last arrest before his death was for smoking at an airport to protest the "demonization of smokers"? I guess the far left and far right do wrap around and meet sometimes. ;-)
9 posted on 05/01/2003 5:05:46 AM PDT by Kip Lange (The Khaki Pants of Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Flurry
Don't kid yourself. It'll come to Alabama, too. I was in California when it hit there, and people in Boston chuckled politely and thought it would never come out here. Now it's landing with a thud, courtesy of Mumbles Menino, and going to put God knows how many small business owners out of business. It's bad enough that we keep up this obscene taxes -- which target lower tax-bracket folks anyway (where are the Dems on this one, eh? Where is ANYONE on this one?!? argh). This makes my blood boil. So much so that I need to fire up a butt.
10 posted on 05/01/2003 5:08:15 AM PDT by Kip Lange (The Khaki Pants of Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

"...*these* obscene taxes..." (whoops)
11 posted on 05/01/2003 5:14:23 AM PDT by Kip Lange (The Khaki Pants of Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kip Lange
You don't understand Alabama. We have had several cities fail in attempting to ban smoking in restaurants. Bars would be absurd and would be repealed if it ever passed. For the record CA and MA are not known as bastions of individual rights.
12 posted on 05/01/2003 5:14:34 AM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (At Least I'm Relevent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Flurry
In Alabama we require smoking in bars. It keeps the riff raff out.

Real cute! You sure your in the right forum? I hear the Liberal forum is looking for you!

13 posted on 05/01/2003 5:19:43 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
Not only should they outlaw smoking in bars, they ought to outlaw bars for their corrupting influence in society.

Then they ought to outlaw or severely regulate and tax unhealthy foods.

Then there should be legislative 'incentives' to 'encourage' people to have an active fitness program with quantifiable results.

There should also be a law and taxes regulating the amount of television (in any form) and the amount of time on the computer one spends.

Hey, if people cannot or will not take care of themselves properly, it is the duty of the government to take care of people and make them refrain from what might be harmful, and require them to do what may be beneficial ala the War on(Some)Drugs.

/sarcastic rant

Funny how people don't give a damn about infringements on freedoms until it is their freedoms that are in danger.

14 posted on 05/01/2003 5:19:52 AM PDT by Eagle Eye (There ought to be a law against excessive legislation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flurry
In Alabama we require smoking in bars. It keeps the riff raff out.

ARE YOU CALLING ME "RIFF RAFF???????????" Sounds like the ABUSE BUTTON is in order here!

15 posted on 05/01/2003 5:20:43 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
PROVE IT JERK! Show me ONE death certificate that states just ONE person died from second hand smoke...........then maybe I might .........just MIGHT believe it.

I don't care if they DO show you a death certificate. As far as the EPA is concerned, after doubling the margin of error to 10%, still only finding one study, then delving into pure sham-science "meta-analysis"...oh, they've "proven" it.

I've seen the numbers. I *know* the lengths they went to in order to fabricate the second-hand-smoke baloney in order to tell *you* that *you* can't smoke because it's not good for "someone else" -- instead of not just good for you.

Utter BS. Just give me ONE politician to stand up on run on this issue...and *win* on it...and we will start having people run scared. They're sheep. The won't want to touch an issue that could make them lose the campaign. But why has no one TRIED to organize the dang smokers? And the small business owners affected? Why? Do the Health Nazis goose-step unopposed?

Elitist SOBs. They'll also show you polls showing people support the ban on smoking in bars/restaurants. They won't shwo you polls, however, of *just* restaurant and ESPECIALLY bar *patrons* and *owners*. People in Ivory Towers telling me what's good for me. Grrrrrr...

16 posted on 05/01/2003 5:22:10 AM PDT by Kip Lange (The Khaki Pants of Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kip Lange

17 posted on 05/01/2003 5:22:22 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye
Funny how people don't give a damn about infringements on freedoms until it is their freedoms that are in danger.

Oh listen! The lawmakers sit in their little cocoons and are WELL protected from losing ANY of their rights. They sit on their high seat and let the power hungry control take over to "stick it to the little people."


18 posted on 05/01/2003 5:24:32 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye
Correction:

"Funny how ^some^ people don't give a damn about infringements on freedoms until it is their freedoms that are in danger."

Don't generalize, now. ;-)

19 posted on 05/01/2003 5:26:36 AM PDT by Kip Lange (The Khaki Pants of Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
Smoking is not a left right issue. I think you'll find that most laws concerning smoking are passed by Democrats. So maybe one of us is in the wrong place.
20 posted on 05/01/2003 5:29:47 AM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (At Least I'm Relevent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-248 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson